用戶:Hinnia/沙盒/History Notes (Leadership
First Crusade Motivations
First Crusade Leadership
Leadership
- Certainly responsible for success
- No single commander in chief
- No kings
- Henry IV and Philip I excommunicated
- Princes from various parts of Europe
Initial Division
Attitude towards Pope
- German and Lotharingians supporters of Henry IV
- Raymond of Toulouse supported Pope
Attitude towards Alexius
- Raymond of Toulouse was happy to swear Allegiance
- Bohemond did not wish to be subject to Alexius’s power
Attitude towards Power and Land
- Bohemond and Tancred seeking land
- Robert of Normandy seeking indulgence
First Wave: People’s Crusade
- Peasants army led by Peter the Hermit and Walter Sansavoir
- Caused a lot of trouble
- Shipped across to Asia Minor within a week
- Slaughtered by Kilij Arslan
- Shows how terrible the crusade could have gone without good leadership even with a divided Muslim enemy
Council of Princes
- If the crusade was to succeed
- Had to overcome differences
- Set hierarchical chain of command
- Provided a forum in the absence of a single commander for decisions to be reached jointly
- Took Nicea
- With the help of Tacticius
- Two wave strategy
- Worked well
- Suck up pressure from Kilij Arslan
- Dorylaeum
- Bohemond and Robert of Normandy attacked by the Turks
- Two princes took up a defensive position
- With the support of the second wave made the Turks retreat
- Secures Asia Minor
Bohemond Leadership
Capture of Antioch
- Foraging Strategy
- Raymond foraged in Ruj Valley
- Tancred in areas surrounding Harim
- Ensured supplies
- Helped them survive
- Financial Support
- Raymond of Toulouse was very wealthy
- Used this money to help the Crusaders
- Built La Mahomerie
- Secret Negotiations
- Negotiations with someone inside the city
- Allowed access to Antioch
Secure of Antioch
- Bridge Gate
- Arranged for his troops to leavee
- Kerbogha’s troops at other gates would not be able to reach him as the river blocked their path
- 7 divisions
- Each with a clear leader
- Help keep the army in formation
- Thinned out force of Kerbogha
- While convincing Kerbogha that his army was not an all-out offensive
- Kept back extra troops in a separate division
- Rearguard
- Stopped Kerbogha’s first relief force from supporting main force
Siege of Jerusalem
- 5 weeks, rather than 7.5 months like Antioch
- Tactical genius shown
- Crusade leadership maintain unity to the end
- Range of strategies
- Siege tower to enter Jerusalem
- Eastern wall (vulnerable)
Other factors
Popular pressure
- Disagreements after the siege of Antioch
- Crusade faced paralysis
- Stopped for 6 months
- Only because of popular pressure that the First Crusade continued
Muslim World
- Divided into Shia and Sunni
- Sunni would rather align with Crusaders against Shia and vice versa
- Key Central Leaders died at the same time
- Caused political fragmentation
- By 1097-99 there was a power vacuum in Asia Miinor
- Princes faced small rival lordships
- Muslims failed to recognise the crusade as an army of religious conquest
- Gave the Crusaders an advantage
Second Crusade Motivations
Second Crusade Leadership
Leaders
- Eugenius has tight control of preaching
- No peoples crusade
- Proper Kings
- Louis VII, the king of France
- Conrad III, the king of Germany
- State power and resources
- Unified before heading to Outremer
- Louis deliberately went with Conrad by land
- Avoid antagonising Conrad
- Conrad was in conflict with Scicily
- In return Conrad offered fleet at Regensburg
- Supposed to be successful
- Not the case
- Failure largely due to bad leadership
German Campaign (Octobebr 1147 to June 1148)
- Departed with 8 days of supplies, estimating a 20-day journey
- Assuming they could acquire supplies along the way
- Plan did not go as expected
- Overconfidence and the lack of control by Manuel I
- The crusaders were ambushed by the Turks near Dorylaeum.
- Retreat to Nicaea with a casualty rate of around 17 percent.
Failure to consult leaders of the crusader states
- Did not consult with the leaders of Outremer (the Crusader states)
- Initial goal: recapture Edessa
- But was destroyed in 1146
- Still had same goal in 1148 (Conrad letter)
- Spent four months to establish new goal
- Hindered progress into Outremer
- Incurred additional expenses
- Did not adequately respond to the needs of all the Crusader states
- Antioch plam, which reflected northern interests
- Jerusalem plan, which focused on the threat faced by the south
- Decided to head south to Damascus
- Contributed to delays and misalignment of objectives during the Second Crusade.
Siege of Damascus 1148
- Began successfully
- Attack by King Baldwin III's troops supported by Louis VII's soldiers.
- Conrad III made significant gains
- Goal was to attack the city walls and defeat the garrison
- Changed their plan and attacked a weak point in the eastern walls.
- Bad decision
- No water or food
- Exhaustion and retreat after three days.
- Ended unsuccessfully.
Other factors
Muslim world
- Far more untied
- Much more powerful enemy when compared with first crusade
- 1105: Al Sulami first preaches jihad
- 1146 Nur ad-Din deployed Jihad
Lack of support from the Byzantines
- First Crusade received support from the Byzantine Empire
- Taticius sent to provide crucial guidance and support in battle.
- Second Crusade Manuel I did not have good relations with the two kings
- He did not provide the same support
- Also had a treaty with the Turks
- Betrayed the crusader’s location or plans for their enemy